Map

Śaiva Āgama

The revealed Śaiva scriptures: the five streams, the twenty-eight Āgamas, the sixty-four Bhairava tantras, the thirty-six tattvas, and the long argument between dualists and non-dualists over what a soul is.

This is the largest body of scripture in the Indian tradition that most readers have never seen a line of. It governed temple worship from Kashmir to the Tamil country for a thousand years, produced a philosophical literature to rival any in Sanskrit, and then — in the north — was almost entirely lost, surviving as manuscripts in Nepal and Kashmir and as the doctrine of a few Tamil lineages who kept the ritual alive.

Āgama and Nigamaआगम · निगम

Āgama means "that which has come down", and it stands against nigama, the Vedic revelation — not as its rival but as a second channel. The distinction is not one of subject but of mode. The Veda is apauruṣeya, authorless and beginningless, heard by ṛṣis and transmitted by exact recitation; its authority rests on having no speaker at all. The Āgama is spoken: it is dialogue, Śiva to the Goddess or the Goddess to Śiva, and its authority rests entirely on who speaks. On its own account this makes it more direct rather than less.

The consequence is a different economy of access. Vedic knowledge passes by memorisation within a birth-community. Āgamic knowledge passes by dīkṣā, initiation — which the tradition insists can be given to a person of any birth, and frequently says so in as many words. That claim is doctrinally load-bearing rather than merely liberal: if bondage is a condition of consciousness rather than of caste, then only a ritual acting on consciousness can remove it.

The Saiddhāntika exegetes worked hard to hold the two authorities together, arguing that the Āgama is Vedic in substance and simply addressed to a different capacity. The non-dualists of Kashmir were bolder: Abhinavagupta ranks the revelations, and the Veda comes low.

The five streamsपञ्चस्रोतस्

Śiva as Sadāśiva is described with five faces, and the whole Śaiva revelation is classified by which face utters it. The scheme is not a filing system; it is a claim that a single source articulates itself into currents of quite different character.

Gāruḍa and Bhūta barely survive as independent literatures, though their material was absorbed wholesale into later ritual manuals — the snakebite and exorcism sections of many a Siddhānta paddhati are Gāruḍa and Bhūta material under new management. The two streams that carried the tradition forward are Siddhānta and Bhairava, and they went in opposite doctrinal directions from a shared ritual base.

The Siddhānta: the twenty-eightसिद्धान्त

The Siddhānta is the mild stream and, until the modern period, by far the larger. Its twenty-eight Āgamas divide into ten Śiva-bheda and eighteen Rudra-bheda, each said to carry subsidiary upāgamas traditionally counted at two hundred and seven.

In practice a much smaller set does the work. The Kāmika, Kāraṇa and Aṃśumat dominate living temple ritual in the Tamil country. For doctrine the crucial texts are the Kiraṇa, the Mataṅgapārameśvara, the Mṛgendra, the Svāyambhuvasūtrasaṅgraha, the Rauravasūtrasaṅgraha and the Niḥśvāsatattvasaṃhitā — the last being, on present evidence, the oldest surviving Śaiva tantra of any kind, its earliest strata perhaps of the fifth or sixth century. The Mṛgendra and Mataṅga are technically upāgamas and are nonetheless among the most philosophically serious works in the corpus.

Pati, paśu, pāśaपति · पशु · पाश

The Siddhānta's frame is threefold and irreducibly so. Pati is the Lord; paśu, literally the beast tethered, is the bound soul; pāśa is the tether. All three are eternal and real, and none is reducible to another. Liberation does not dissolve the soul into Śiva — it removes the tether, whereupon the soul realises the qualities it always latently possessed, and becomes śiva-samāna, equal to Śiva, sharing his omniscience and omnipotence while remaining numerically distinct.

The tether is likewise threefold: āṇava-mala, the primal impurity; karman, the residue of action; and māyā, the material cause of the worlds. And here lies the Siddhānta's most characteristic and most contested doctrine — mala is a substance, a dravya, an actual physical impurity adhering to the soul as the husk adheres to rice or verdigris to copper. Because it is a substance, it cannot be removed by knowledge. Knowledge does not scour copper. Only a real operation on a real impurity will serve, and that operation is dīkṣā.

The Saiddhāntika exegetes

The scriptures are anonymous; the philosophy has authors, and they are formidable.

Sadyojyotisc. 675–725

The earliest Saiddhāntika exegete whose work survives. Nareśvaraparīkṣā, Mokṣakārikā, Paramokṣanirāsakārikā — the last a systematic refutation of every rival account of liberation. He establishes the method: scripture defended by argument, not merely quoted.

Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇakaṇṭhac. 950

The Mṛgendravṛtti. Father of Rāmakaṇṭha, and with him the centre of the Kashmirian Siddhānta at its height.

Bhaṭṭa Rāmakaṇṭha IIc. 950–1000

The greatest of them. The Kiraṇavṛtti, Mataṅgavṛtti, Nareśvaraparīkṣāprakāśa, and a commentary on the Sanskrit Sārdhatriśatikālottara. His argument for a permanent, unchanging self against the Buddhist denial of it is among the sharpest in Sanskrit philosophy — and he was working in the same city, in the same decades, as Abhinavagupta.

Bhojadeva11th c., Mālava

The Tattvaprakāśa — a compact statement of Siddhānta doctrine from the Paramāra king whose court also produced the Narpati Jayacaryā a little later.

Aghoraśiva12th c., Cidambaram

The turn south. His Kriyākramadyotikā becomes the standard ritual manual for Tamil Śaiva priests and remains in use. With him the Siddhānta's centre of gravity shifts to the Tamil country, where it survives; in Kashmir it dies out.

Dīkṣā and the cosmic ladderदीक्षा

If mala is a substance, initiation must be a real operation, and the Siddhānta's ritual is built accordingly. The classical etymology splits dīkṣā into dī, giving, and kṣa, destroying: knowledge is given and the bond destroyed. The guru installs the disciple's soul on a cord, traverses with it the entire hierarchy of the cosmos, and burns away the karma belonging to each level in turn.

That hierarchy is the five kalās, which order the thirty-six tattvas and the two hundred and twenty-four bhuvanas, worlds, distributed through them:

The types of initiation are correspondingly graded: samaya-dīkṣā admits to the observances; viśeṣa- and nirvāṇa-dīkṣā confer liberation, guaranteed at death; sadyonirvāṇa-dīkṣā is given to the dying; and ācārya-abhiṣeka creates a teacher who may in turn initiate. The doctrine that liberation is guaranteed by a correctly performed ritual — irrespective of the initiate's later understanding — is the sharpest expression of the Siddhānta's realism, and the thing the non-dualists found hardest to accept.

The Bhairava stream: the sixty-fourभैरव

The Bhairava tantras take the same ritual vocabulary and invert its metaphysics. There is one reality; the appearance of a bound soul is that reality's own free act; and the fierce, impure and excluded are not obstacles to be purified but the most direct available means. The idiom is the cremation ground, the skull-bowl, wine, meat and the yoginī, and the earliest strata do not soften any of it.

The sixty-four are grouped in eight aṣṭakas of eight — Bhairava, Yāmala, Mata, Maṅgala, Cakra, Bahurūpa, Vāgīśa, Śikhā — and the stream divides in two by whether god or goddess sits at the centre:

Mantrapīṭhaमन्त्रपीठ · the seat of mantras

God-centred. Its principal scripture is the Svacchanda Tantra, whose deity is Svacchandabhairava with Aghoreśvarī, and which in Kashmir became the tantra of general lay practice — Kṣemarāja's Uddyota on it is one of the monuments of the tradition.

Vidyāpīṭhaविद्यापीठ · the seat of vidyās

Goddess-centred, and on its own account the higher. It holds the Yāmalas (Brahmayāmala/Picumata, Rudrayāmala), the Śakti-tantras, and — most consequentially — the Trika and the Kālīkula. Its practice is where the kāpālika observance and the yoginī cult belong.

Trika, Krama, Kaula

Trikaत्रिक

Named for the three goddesses Parā, Parāparā, Aparā. Root scripture the Mālinīvijayottara; also the Siddhayogeśvarīmata and the Parātrīśikā. Its exponent is Abhinavagupta, whose Tantrāloka presents itself as an unfolding of the Mālinīvijayottara alone.

Kramaक्रम

Kālī as the devouring sequence of cognition — the twelve Kālīs being the phases by which any act of knowing arises, holds, and is consumed. Fiercely non-dual, little interested in ritual, and the source of much of what is most radical in Abhinavagupta's account of consciousness. He was an initiate of it.

Kaulaकौल

Less a scripture-group than a mode running through the others: clan-lineage transmission, the transgressive rites, and the insistence that what is ordinarily excluded is the very means. Abhinavagupta received it from Śambhunātha, and his treatment of it in Tantrāloka 29 is the classical statement. Its later, domesticated descendant is the Śrīvidyā.

The thirty-six tattvasषट्त्रिंशत्तत्त्व

Sāṅkhya counts twenty-five levels of reality, from puruṣa down to earth. Śaiva Āgama accepts all twenty-five and adds eleven above — and the addition is the whole doctrinal difference. Sāṅkhya's ladder ends in a plurality of isolated witnesses, passive and inert. The Śaiva ladder continues upward into a single consciousness that is actively issuing the entire structure.

The five cloaksपञ्चकञ्चुक

Kalāकला

Omnipotence contracts to limited capacity. I can do a little.

Vidyāविद्या

Omniscience contracts to limited knowledge. I know a little.

Rāgaराग

Fullness contracts to appetite. I lack, and want.

Kālaकाल

Eternity contracts to succession. I am in time.

Niyatiनियति

Freedom contracts to causal order. I am placed, and constrained.

For the non-dualists, limitation is not imposed from outside. It is consciousness veiling itself, freely — svātantrya, sovereign freedom, is the master term, and it is what distinguishes this system from every Vedāntic account in which limitation is finally an error to be negated. Here it is an act to be recognised as one's own. That is why release can be described as recognition rather than acquisition: nothing must be obtained, because nothing was ever lost.

The quarrel over mala

The disagreement between the two streams is not a matter of emphasis. It is a precise metaphysical dispute with a precise practical consequence, and both sides knew exactly what was at stake.

Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta argue that a substance-impurity is incoherent: a substance cannot attach to consciousness, which is not the sort of thing a substance can adhere to, and if it could, no operation could reach it. Rāmakaṇṭha replies that an impurity which is mere non-cognition cannot explain why the soul has been bound beginninglessly, nor why release requires anything at all — if ignorance were the only bond, the mere hearing of a true sentence would liberate everyone who heard it, which it plainly does not.

The two positions produce two different religions out of the same scriptures. One is a ritual system whose sacraments do real metaphysical work. The other is a philosophy of recognition in which the sacraments are pedagogy. Both are Śaiva; both cite Āgama; and for roughly a century in tenth-century Kashmir their greatest exponents lived in the same city.

The Kashmirian non-dualists

Vasuguptac. 800–850

The Śiva Sūtra, by tradition found inscribed on a rock on Mahādeva mountain. Possibly also the Spanda Kārikā.

Kallaṭac. 875

Vasugupta's pupil; the Spandavṛtti. With him the doctrine of the pulse becomes a school.

Somānandac. 900

The Śivadṛṣṭi — the founding work of the Pratyabhijñā, and a sustained attack on the grammarians' view that the ultimate is śabda, the word.

Utpaladevac. 925

Somānanda's pupil. The Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā with his own vṛtti and vivṛti — the philosophical core of the whole tradition, and the text Abhinavagupta twice commented on.

Abhinavaguptac. 975–1025

The synthesis. Tantrāloka in thirty-seven chapters; Tantrasāra, his own prose abridgement; the two Pratyabhijñā commentaries; the Parātrīśikāvivaraṇa; and, in a different key, the Abhinavabhāratī on the Nāṭyaśāstra, which makes aesthetic experience a species of the same recognition.

Kṣemarājac. 1000–1050

His pupil, and the tradition's great commentator: Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya (twenty sūtras, the shortest complete statement), Śivasūtravimarśinī, Spandanirṇaya, Svacchandoddyota, Netroddyota. Most readers meet Kashmir Śaivism through him.

Jayarathac. 1225

The Tantrālokaviveka — without which the Tantrāloka would be largely unreadable, and which preserves quotations from scores of tantras now lost.

What happened to it

The Śaiva Age, as it is now called, ran roughly from the seventh to the thirteenth century, and for much of it this was the dominant religion of the Indian subcontinent — royal chaplains initiated kings, and Śaiva ritual specialists consecrated the temples of dynasties from Kashmir to Java and Cambodia. Its decline in the north came with the political collapse of its patrons; in Kashmir the tradition survived as a household practice and a manuscript culture rather than an institution.

In the south it did not decline at all. The Siddhānta became the theology of the Tamil Śaiva establishment, absorbed the devotional poetry of the Nāyaṉmārs, and produced in the Meykaṇṭa Śāstras a Tamil philosophical literature of its own. The priests who perform the daily worship in Cidambaram, Madurai and Tanjore today are performing rites codified in these texts by Aghoraśiva in the twelfth century.